John a t robinson redating the new testament

Personally I didn’t follow up on the material provided but I’m sure it can be useful to others as he cites many authors unheard of by majority of scholars.Also Robinson is very in-depth with his research and doesn’t leave one stone unturned. Robinson (1919-1983) was a thoroughgoing theological modernist.To the western scholar and theologian, the questions of who wrote what and when are quite important.

john a t robinson redating the new testament-29

Yet Robinson does the Church a great service by laying bare the ephemeral nature of the claims that many of the New Testament writings were not written by their ascribed authors.

He notes that the claims based on statistical word counts, diction, and style are all over the map, pointing to the probability that their differences can be ascribed as much to differences in the preconceptions used to construct the statistical algorithms.

Below I will attach some of the charts he provides related to the dating of the books and some of the historical events in the book of Acts (Paul’s timeline for example) My favorite sections that Robinson wrote on were that of Acts, Hebrews and Revelation. He began writing this book as a theological exercise, as "little more than a theological joke".

His main and final conclusion thus is “There is, first of all, the observation that all the various types of the early church’s literature (including the Didache, a version of its ‘manual of discipline’) were coming into being more or less concurrently in the period between 40 and 70.”This book will definitely effect you if not completely change your mind on the assumed dates that you have been taught without any internal exegetical or external historical evidence. At some point he asked himself "why any of the books of the New Testament needed to be put after the fall of Jerusalem in 70." He notes that none of the books make any reference (actual or metaphorical) to the destruction of Jerusalem as a past event. Robinson (1919-1983) was a thoroughgoing theological modernist.

"If the chronology of the documents and the pattern of development should turn out to be anything like what I have suggested, then there will be scope for numerous new 'trajectories' to be drawn and for rewriting many introductions to - and ultimately theologies of - the New Testament.

For dates remain disturbingly fundamental data." Dr.

On the one hand he brilliantly exposes the meagre arguments behind the traditional dating of the New Testament writings, but on the other he replaces this traditional dating with a new theory that in my opinion is even weaker than the chronology he questions.

The core of Robinson’s theor Redating the New Testament is a cunning book, in which Robinson hides his chronological theory, substantiated with the heavyweights of biblical scholarship, behind a facade of light-footed intellectual frivolity.

This is the complete dating of the New Testament to which Robinson arrives after detailed and scrupulous research. He contrasts this with the apocryphal books, with their use of the Bishop Dr. He began writing this book as a theological exercise, as "little more than a theological joke".

Tags: , ,